Government Essay

[Name of the Writer]

[Name of Instructor]

[Subject]

[Date]

Government Essay

Introduction

The role that is stated in this essay is the role of a Governor. This particular role in the Texas plural executive is chosen because of its esteem along with the issues this role have to deal with. A governor is responsible for taking care of a whole city by imposing different legislations and executions (Bustillos, pp. 6). Choosing this office out of all other roles is mainly because of the issue that is facing the executive and the goal behind solving this issue. Moreover, after addressing the issue, the accomplishment is also something valuable. All of this discussion would be evaluated below along with providing options for dealing with the issue. The other paragraphs of this discussion would deal with the role, issue, goals and what the governor has accomplished so far. Moreover, the discussion of this essay would include options which would deal with these issues. Each option has different advantages and disadvantages.

Discussion

Identification

The two main issues that are becoming a concern for the governor are school vouchers and abortion restrictions. The school vouchers are a considerable problem as parents are being observant and restrictive of paying too much cash for their children’s studying. However, the voucher measures the scope of the child's private school study program (Epple, pp. 92). The flexibility of the school choice and the low-income school's separation from the church is a measurement which the Governor would have to review. Moreover, the second dispute and problem are the abortion restrictions, in which the governor regulate some items. Such as prohibiting abortion coverage under an insurance plan and refusing any abortion practice during any health complication outcomes. The governor can try to solve this problem by passing an anti-abortion bill and the first issue by promoting low-income schools for parents to afford. These are the options which I chose to implement while dealing with the problems identified.

The advantages of these options are that it will provide more opportunities for students to have admission in low-income schools so that more availability of programs and study options are available. Moreover, the resources which can be utilized in other things can be utilized for the same aspect of rural Republicans. Furthermore, the advantage of having to prohibit abortion coverage or restrict any anti-abortion bill would require females to have a health insurance plan. Moreover, the disadvantage for using these options illustrate as the governor's role of not being able to utilize enough resources towards the other issues that need more attention but rather these issues which are more trivial (Mucciaroni, pp. 18). Student subsidies and anti-abortion while providing health insurances would require a substantial amount of money from the government. As a governor, I would have to tackle these issues by delivering a solution while using the resources that are available.

Conclusion

The options which I chose to deal with the issues is aforementioned, and the reason why these options have been selected is because of its possibility. If more health care programs and health insurances are provided, unnecessary abortion would not be required. Moreover, if a plan for building a school structure is subsidized, so more opportunities for children and flexibility for parents can be created (Lavena, pp. 114). Also, the governor can solve these issues more reluctantly and promptly while dealing with other state issues. The connection of ethical decision making with the choice I made refers to the importance and ambiguity of understanding. As a plural executive, a Governor is required to make an action plan for the state and deal with all the issues that are being faced by the people and the children of all communities.

Works Cited

Bustillos, Dan. "Political Pitfalls in Policymaking: The Texas HPV Vaccine Policy Saga." Narrative inquiry in bioethics 6.1 (2016): 6-10.

Epple, Dennis, Richard E. Romano, and Miguel Urquiola. "School vouchers: A survey of the economics literature." Journal of Economic Literature 55.2 (2017): 441-92.

Lavena, Cecilia Florencia. "Whistle-blowing: individual and organizational determinants of the decision to report wrongdoing in the federal government." The American Review of Public Administration 46.1 (2016): 113-136.

Mucciaroni, Gary, Kathleen Ferraiolo, and Meghan E. Rubado. "Framing morality policy issues: state legislative debates on abortion restrictions." Policy Sciences (2018): 1-19.