More Subjects
What Role Should Logic Play In Modern Argument? Which Approach To Reasoning Do You Think Will Be Most Useful For You In The Research Argument That You Are Developing In This Course?
[Name of the Writer]
[Name of Instructor]
[Subject]
[Date]
What Role Should Logic Play In Modern Argument?
Introduction
An argument is a very important source of exchange of ideas between two or more than two people. The term "argument" basically refers to the reason or set of reasons, in support or opposition of an idea, theory or practice. An argument also means the exchange of opposite of diverting ideas.
Most of the times, an argument is taken from a negative perspective. An argument is mostly perceived to be a heated or angry discussion, in which the participants exchange their ideas in an aggressive manner which may not be true. An argument may just be the flow of ideas from one participant to the other, with or without the use of aggression. But the most important factor that should be present in an argument is "logic." An argument is incomplete without the presence of a sound logic. Arguments become influential in the presence of a strong logic as logic forms the basis or root of the argument (Johnson). The following essay will throw light on the fact that a logic is an essential and integral part of any argument and deductive reasoning is the best approach to prove the worth of an argument.
Discussion
(Body of supporting evidence)
Logic has always been a very important and integral part of any argument as it puts weight in the arguments. Any argument, if not backed up by the strong pillars of logic, will have less convincing power and very low power to put an impact. An argument is like a plant that will stand weak until it is nourished by the strong fertilizer of logic and watered with reasoning.
Many scholars and experts have laid emphasis over the importance and energy of logic in an argument. The terms of logic and argument hold great value in the arenas of philosophy, as the discipline of philosophy, relies heavily upon the basis of exchange of ideas and formulation of ideas on the basis of these ideas. If the idea would not have a strong base, how it can become a strong theory (Van Eemeren). A weak argument can never be a basis of a strong theory, and it is a universal fact that theories, when testified and proven correct repeatedly, become laws.
So can we risk our laws to be entirely baseless or, if based on some reasoning, based on weak grounds? The answer would definitely be No. The modern argumentators or instigators are also of the same view, which is why, while preparing their arguments, they always go for well-researched and well-thought out logics, in order to make their points more valid and robust.
Mostly, scholars and philosophers adopt two approaches for developing a logic or reasoning. One is the inductive reasoning approach, and the other is called deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning uses the extraction of facts and figures from multiple sets of data and develops its reasoning from there, whereas in deductive reasoning, comprises of drawing the truth, from a broad and generalized spectrum.
Deductive reasoning is a much better approach for the basis of formation of ideas and logics as it gives out the conclusion on the basis of truth or false. On the other hand, in inductive reasoning, the findings are not induced to be true or false (Sik), but they become strong or weak arguments. Another major difference between both the approaches is that in inductive reasoning, it is understood that the conclusions can change. It is flexible an can be changed whenever a strong argument comes to take its place.
Conclusion
Hence, the importance of logic can be clearly seen in the building up and presentation of an argument. The condition only implies that the logic should be valid and should not be changing. It should provide the final answer to the questions of the participant involved in the argument.
Works Cited
Johnson, Ralph H. The rise of informal logic: Essays on argumentation, critical thinking, reasoning, and politics. Vol. 2. University of Windsor, 2014.
Sik, Kubra. "Tradition or modernism in grammar teaching: deductive vs. inductive approaches." Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 (2015): 2141-2144.
Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Routledge, 2016.
More Subjects
Join our mailing list
© All Rights Reserved 2024