More Subjects
Capital Investment Techniques
Name
Institution
Course
Instructor’s name
Date
Introduction
The underlying concept in the decision making of capital investment cost-benefit analysis (Nijman, and Kampfraath). This process helps to facilitate the determination of a company’s short term and long term investments. Advertising campaigns, equipment, new machinery, new plants, research and development projects are some of some company components that come under this kind of capital investment appraisal. The case studies below demonstrate how different techniques used to determine capital investment appraisal of a business project (Marić, 2018).
Case study 1)
A= 300,000(1+0.04) ^5
A=$ 364,995.87 (amount in the account after five years)
2) Payback Period
90,000+115,000+135,000 =340,000
The inflows will get to $300,000 in year 3. Thus we will recover our initial amount in the third year.
3)
Yr
Amnt
Discounting factor
Discounted amount
Accumulative inflow cash
One
90,000.00
1.060
84,905.66
84,905.66
Two
115,000.00
1.124
102,313.17
187,218.83
Three
135,000.00
1.191016
113,348.60
187,218.83
4)
NPV
Yr
Cash inflow
PVIF$1=1/(1+r)^n
Discounted inflow cash
Accumulative
One
90,000.00
0.943400
84,905.66
84,905.66
Two
115,000
0.8900
102,349.59
187,255.25
Three
135,000
0.8396
113,348.60
300,603.85
Four
110,000
0.7921
87,130.30
387,734.15
Five
90,000
0.7373
67,253.24
454,987.39
present value (pv) of total inflows =$ 454,987.39
Net Present Value =$(454,987.39-300,000.00)
=$154,987.39
5) If I would leave the money for five years in the bank but get $ 364,995.87, ending up short of 85,004.13 but when I undertook a project I would get $ 454,987.39 after 5 years which is $ 154,987.39 more.
Case study 2
A)
NBP
Yr
Amnt of Savings
cumulative Savings
One
60,000.00
60,000.00
Two
60,000.00
120,000.00
Three
60,000.00
180,000.00
PBP =60,000/12 = 5,000
PBP = 2 years and 9 months.
DBP
Yr
Amnt
PVIF$1=1/(1+r)^n
Discounted amnt
cumulative
One
60,000.00
1.10
54,545.45
54,545.45
Two
60,000.00
1.21
49,586.78
104,132.23
Three
60,000.00
1.331
45,078.89
149,211.12
The PBP is 165,000-104,132.23=60,867.77
Assuming the 45,078.89 was evenly accrued 60,867.77/3,756.57=16.2
PBP= 3 years 4.2 months
NPV
Year
Amount
PVIF$1=1/(1+r)^n
Discounted amnt
cumulative
0
-165,000.00
1.00
-165,000.00
-165,000.00
One
60,000.00
1.10
54,545.45
54,545.45
Two
60,000.00
1.21
49,586.78
104,132.23
Three
60,000.00
1.331
45,078.89
149,211.12
NPV= -165,000+149,211.12 = -15788.88
IRR=
B)
NBP
Yr
Amnt
Accumulated
One
60,000.00
60,000.00
Two
72,600.00
132,600.00
Three
79,860.00
212,460.00
PBP 79,860/12=6,655
So the PBP is 2 yrs 1 month
DBP
Yr
Amnt
PVIF$1=1/(1+r)^n
Discounted amount
Cumulative
One
60,000.00
1.0
54,545.45
54,545.45
Two
72,600.00
1.21
60,000
114,545.45
Three
79,860.00
1.331
60,000
174545.45
The PBP is60,000/12= 5,000
165,000-114,545.45=50,454.55
50,454.55/5000=10.1
PBP= 10 years and 1 month
Net Present Value
Yr
Amnt
PVIF$1=1/(1+r)^n
Discounted amnt
Cumulative
0
-165,000.00
1.0
-165,000
-165,000
One
60,000.00
1.10
54,545.45
54,545.45
Two
72,600.00
1.21
60,000
114,545.45
Three
79,860.00
1.331
60,000
174545.45
NPV= -165,000+174,545.45 = $9,545.45
IRR=
C)
NBP
Yr
Amount
Cumulated Savings
One
60,000.00
60,000.00
Two
60,000.00
120,000.00
Three
60,000.00
180,000.00
PBP =60,000/12 = 5,000
PBP = 2 yrs 9 months.
Discounted PBP
Yr
Amount
Discounting factor
Discounted amnt
Accumulative
One
60,000.00
1.150
52,173.91
52,173.91
Two
60,000
1.332
45,045.05
97,218.96
Three
60,000
1.52088
39,450.84
136,669.80
The amount required to attain PBP is not met
NPV
Yr
Amnt
Discounting factor
Discounted amnt
Accumulative
0
-165,000,oo
1
-165,000
-165,000
1
60,000.00
0.869600
52,176
112,824
2
60,000
0.7561
45,366
97,542
3
60,000
0.6575
39,450
136,992
NPV= -165,000+136,992= -28,008
IRR=
D)
NBP
Yr
Amount
Accumulated amount
One
60,000.00
60,000.00
Two
60,000.00
120,000.00
three
60,000.00
180,000.00
PBP =60,000/12 = 5,000
PBP is 2 years and 9 months.
DBP
Yr
Amnt
Discounting factor
Discounted amnt
Accumulative
0
165,000
1
-165,000
-165,000
1
60,000
0.909091
54,545.46
54,545.46
2
60,000
0.826446
49,586.76
104,132.22
3
60,000
0.751315
45,078.9
149,211.12
4
60,000
0.683013
40,980.78
190,191.9
5
60,000
0.620921
37,255.26
227,447.16
The PBP is 165,000-104,132.22=60,868
Assuming the 37,255.26 was evenly accrued 60,868/3,104.61=19.6
The PBP= 3 years and 6.6 months
NPV
Yr
Amnt
Discounting factor
Discounted amnt
Cumulative
0
165,000.00
1
-165,000
-165,000
One
60,000.00
0.909091
54,545.46
54,545.46
Two
60,000.00
0.826446
49,586.76
104,132.22
Three
60,000.00
0.751315
45,078.9
149,211.12
Four
60,000.00
0.683013
40,980.78
190,191.9
Five
60,000.00
0.620921
37,255.26
227,447.16
NPV= -165,000+227,447.16 = 62,447.16
IRR=
Discussion
1) Recommend is scenario D, because of its short PBP, top NPV and great IRR.
2) aggressive scenario is B. cash flows from both year 2 and 3 have to be compounded re-invested immediately after being realized.
3) the value of management in the discussed scenarios is to understand the difference between option A and B as well as get to know part B earnings are higher than those in A.
4) What to consider before making a recommendation (Nguyen)
Present economic conditions
Technology
Government laws and policies
5) I would approve this proposal because of the high returns I would gain.
Yr
Amount
Cumulative amnt
0
-585,000.00
-585,000.00
Five
-20,000.00
-605,000.00
One
-85,000.00
-85,000.00
Two
15,000.00
-70,000.00
Three
48,600.00
-21,000.00
Four
72,200.00
50,800.00
Five
95,550.00
146,000.00
Six
101,300.00
247,650.00
Seven
125,200.00
372,850.00
Eight
140,000.00
513,050.00
We lack a PBP
513,050 is less than 605,000
DBP
Yr
Amnt
1/(1+r)^n
Discounted amnt
Cumulative amnt
0
585,000.00
1
585,000
585,000
5
20,000.00
0.567427
11,348.54
596,348.54
1
85,000.00
0.892857
75,892.86
75,892.86
2
15,000.00
0.797194
11,957.91
63,934.95
3
48,600.00
0.71178
34,592.52
29,342 .43
4
72,200.00
0.635518
45,884.41
16,541.98
5
95,500.00
0.5657427
54,189.26
70,731.24
6
101,300.00
0.506631
51,321.73
122,052.97
7
125,200.00
0.452349
56,634.12
178,687.10
8
140,200.00
0.403883
56,624.43
235,311.52
9
300,000.00
0.403883
121,164.97
356,,476.49
Discounted PBP is not achieved by operations cash inflow.
Amount
Discounting factor 1/(1+r)^n
Discounted amount
Cumulative amount
585,000
1
585,000
585,000
20,000
0.567427
11,348.54
596,348.54
85,000
0.892857
75,892.86
75,892.86
15,000
0.797194
11,957.91
63,934.95
48,600
0.71178
34,592.52
29,342 .43
72,200
0.635518
45,884.41
16,541.98
95,500
0.5657427
54,189.26
70,731.24
101,300
0.506631
51,321.73
122,052.97
125,200
0.452349
56,634.12
178,687.10
140,200
0.403883
56,624.43
235,311.52
300,000
0.403883
121,164.97
356,,476.49
NPV= -370,717.47
IRR=4%
Discussion
:1) I would not recommend this purchase because NPV is negative, IRR is low and the absence of PBP it seems very much not viable.
2) -The period of to accomplish the project
-Dynamic economic conditions
-extra tax benefits
-NPV below zero
-Low return rate
-The PBP is not achieved
References
Branislav Marić. "Observing The Dependence Between Dynamic Indicators Of Investment Profitability - Relative Net Present Value And Internal Rate Of Return". AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, vol 5, no. 26, 2011. Academic Journals, doi:10.5897/ajbm10.1464.
Nguyen, Vy. Evaluation Of Capital Investments At Cliniqa Corporation.
Nijman, C, and A. A Kampfraath. The Management Perspective On The Performance Of The Irrigation Subsector.
More Subjects
Join our mailing list
@ All Rights Reserved 2023 info@freeessaywriter.net