More Subjects
HW 2
[Name of the Writer]
[Name of the Institution]
HW 2
Question no 7.9
Graph.
The entire cost of units, with similar crossover point.
4 x = 15000 + 1.82 x
2.18 x = 15000
x = 15000/2.18
x=6.881
Question 8.5(PART A)
For Maitland
Space
Space= Weight x score value
Space= 0.30 x 60
Space= 18
Costs
=0.25 x 40
=10
Traffic Density
=0.20 x 50
= 10
N. Income
=0.15 x 50
= 7.5
Zoning Laws
=0.10 x 80
= 8
For Baptist Church
Space
=0.30 x 70
=21
Costs
= 0.25 x 80
= 20
Traffic Density
= 0.25 x 80
= 20
Neighborhood Income
= 0.15 x 70
= 10.5
Zoning Laws
= 0.10 x 20
= 2
North side Mall
Space
=0.30 x 80
=24
Costs
= 0.25 x 30
= 12
Traffic Density
= 0.25 x 60
= 6
Neighborhood Income
= 0.15 x 40
= 6
Zoning Laws
= 0.10 x 90
= 9
If we look closely at the results the total scores are
Maitland= 53.5
Baptist Church= 69.5
North side Mall = 58.5
The highest Score is 69.5 so Baptist point is the possible and likely option.
PART B
If the factors space and traffic density are reversed than the than the table will have following values
Factor
Maitland
Baptist Church
North side Mall
Space
12
14
16
Costs
10
20
7.5
Traffic Density
15
24
18
Neighborhood Income
7.5
10.5
6
Zoning Laws
8
2
9
52.5
70.5
56.5
By viewing above Baptist Church is still the best option.
Question 8.23
PART A
x-cordinate of the centre of gravity Cx is represented as:
Cx=idix×QiiQi
y-cordinate of the centre of gravity Cy is represented as:
Cy=idiy×QiiQi
Using the equations for the x and y coordinates, we get our value for Cx as,
Cx=25×2,000+25×5,000+55×10,000+50×7,000+80×10,000+70×20,000+90×14,0002,000+5,000+10,000+7,000+10,000+20,000+14,000
Cx=4,535,00068,000
Cx=66.69
We can calculate Cy as,
Cy=45×2,000+25×5,000+55×10,000+45×10,000+20×7,000+50×10,000+20×20,000+25×14,0002,000+5,000+10,000+7,000+10,000+20,000+14,000
Cy=2,055,00068,000
Cy=30.22
Hence for the center of gravity, we get our coordinates as 66.69 and 30.22.
PART B
If the 103 prjected by 20 %
105 projected by 20%
103=10,000 x 1.2
=12,000
105= 10,000 x 1.2
=12,000
Cx=25×2,000+25×5,000+55×12,000+50×7,000+80×12,000+70×20,000+90×14,0002,000+5,000+12,000+7,000+12,000+20,000+14,000
Cx=4,805,00072,000
Cx=66.73
For Cy
Cy=45×2,000+25×5,000+55×12,000+45×12,000+20×7,000+50×12,000+20×20,000+25×14,0002,000+5,000+12,000+7,000+12,000+20,000+14,000
Cy=2,355,00072,000
Cy=32.70
Question 9.4
Based on the information and tables it is said that designed could be as follow.
Materials and Welding
Drills and Grinders
Room 1= Benders
Room 2 = Materials
Room 3=Welding
Room 4=Drills
Room 5= Grinders
Room 6= Lathes
The length in feet would be 60 feet and width would be 40 feet wide.
Question 12.1
By solving the table of L.houts Plastic Charlotte Inventory Levels, we’ll get the following table.
L. Houts Plastic Charlotte Inventory Levels
Item Code no.
Average Inventory
Value
($/UNIT)
Annual Dollar($)
Percentage of Annual Dollar Volume($)
Class
Total Percentage of Annual Dollar Volume($)
1289
400
3.75
1500
44.49%
Class A
80.08%
2347
300
4
1200
35.59%
Class A
80.08%
2349
120
2.5
300
8.90%
Class B
17.13%
2363
75
1.5
112.5
3.34%
Class B
17.13%
2394
60
1.75
105
3.11%
Class B
17.13%
2395
30
2
60
1.78%
Class B
17.13%
7844
12
2.05
24.6
0.73%
Class C
2.79%
6782
20
1.15
23
0.68%
Class C
2.79%
9111
6
3
18
0.53%
Class C
2.79%
8210
8
1.8
14.4
0.43%
Class C
2.79%
8310
7
2
14
0.42%
Class C
2.79%
Total Dollar Volume
3371.5
100.00 %
100.00%
Question 12.5
DATA
Demand Rate, D = 19500
Setup/order cost, S = 25
Holding cost, H=4 $
Unit Price=?
Part a)
EOQ = SQRT ((2* Demand * Order Cost)/ Holding Cost)
EOQ= SQRT ((2*19500*25)/4)
=493.71 Units
=494 Units
Part b)
Annual holding costs for the workbooks = (Quantity of items) * (Holding Cost)/ 2
= 494 * 4/2
= 987.42 $
Part c)
Annual ordering costs for the Workbooks = (Demand* Order Cost)/ Q
Annual ordering costs for the Workbooks = (19500 * 25)/493.71
= 987.42 $
Question no 7.12
In order to solve the problem and make decision in choosing in software, projected volume
is considered. The volume of 80 is above the crossover point so Keith must rent the HP
software.
Question no 12.12
Part a
EOQ = 2DS/H
EOQ = 2(6,000)(30)/10
EOQ = 36,000
EOQ= 189,74 unit
Part b
Average inventory = Q/2 = 94.87 unit
Part c
Optimal number of orders per year= D/Q
=6,000/189.74
=31.62
Part d
Optimal number of days between any two order= working days per year/ number of orders
= 250 days/ 31.62
= 7.91
Part e
Annual cost of ordering and holding cost = (D/Q) S + (Q/2) H
= Working days per year/ number of orders
= 250 days / 31.62
= 7.91
Part f
Total Cost = $ 1897.36 + 6,000 (100) = $ 601,897.36
Question 14.3
Part A
Part B
Question no 14.17
The lot for lot solution for a data is given below.
Period
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Gross Requirement
30
20
40
10
40
60
20
80
10
90
70
10
Beginning Inventory
50
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Net Requirement
0
0
40
10
40
60
20
80
10
90
70
10
Time phase Net Requirement
40
10
40
60
20
80
10
90
70
10
0
Planned Order Release
40
10
40
60
20
80
10
90
70
10
0
Planned Deliveries
40
10
40
60
20
80
10
90
70
10
Ending Inventory
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
The gross cost would last for 10 weeks, so
Holding Cost = 20 * 2.5 = 50
Total Cost = 10*175 + 50 = $1800
More Subjects
Join our mailing list
@ All Rights Reserved 2023 info@freeessaywriter.net