9Y bjbj .9 9 0wf f 8F,rrCEEEEEEr iiCCPi9v/0iif
Your Name (First M. Last)
School or Institution Name (University at Place or Town, State)
This paper will be discussing the short-term advantages of toxic leadership, and the long-term disadvantages of it. Abusive and stern behavior when it comes to leadership might get the work done for the time being, but it can cause issues in the long run.
Table of Contents
Toxic Leadership.....page 4
Study Proving Toxic Leadership is Harmful...................page 4
The Same Study Proving Toxic Leadership to be Beneficial..page 4
Balancing Home and Work Life..page 5
Opportunities of Advancementpage 5
Employed under a merciless bosspage 5
Go All In Culture.page 5
When an abusive and rude person is placed as a leader in an organization, initially the employees get intimidated. This pressure and fear of the employees lead to the work getting done on time (Garrard, Garrard Barlow, 2018).. When a person looks at this from a short-term perspective, it might seem like a good way to get the work done, but it can prove to be harmful in the future.
Study Proving Toxic Leadership is Harmful
A consulting firm Life Meets Work exposed that around 68 of the employees who were working under a boss who was self-centered and abusive, expressed that they no longer felt productive. Apart from that, the efficiency, in the long run, was quite low. The rest of the 35 of the workforce, which was working under a more cooperative boss showed that the deadlines were being met as well. The employees were working calmly but meeting deadlines. Another plus was the fact that the productivity level increased in the long run. 75 of people working under a toxic leader claimed that they would be leaving within the next year. While only 25 of the people said, they would stay.
The Same Study Proving Toxic Leadership to be Beneficial
The same study shed light on the fact that the average time period people stayed under a toxic leader was longer. Around seven years being the average time span an employee lasted under an abusive boss. On the contrary, it was surprising that the average period an employee lasted under a more cooperative boss was lesser. It was five years (Boddy Croft, 2016).. The fascinating findings included how some people admitted on their own that they lasted and worked with an abusive boss longer than a kinder one.
Balancing Home and Work Life
Many workers claimed that working under someone who is not very understanding can be very hard. It took a toll on their lives at home. Around 70 of workers claimed that they had conflicts in their life at home. When it comes to helpful and kind bosses, only 27 people complained.
Opportunities for Advancement
A large number of workers complained that working under a self-centered person reduced their chances of better opportunities (Anninos, 2018). More than 80 of employees told that they could not garner better chances in the corporate world because of the name they were attached to. Hardly 8 of workers complained that they had issues with a good boss.
Employed under a Merciless Boss
It might come as a surprise but working for a cutthroat boss is very common. More than 50 of the people working complained of having a boss who was not very understanding, and demanded work that could not be done in the given time (Edwards, Schedlitzki, Ward Wood, 2015). It has become a regular occurrence that harsh bosses exist. Nowadays, finding a good boss would be harder than a toxic boss.
Go All In Culture
It was also found that the organization that believed in the term Go big or go home were the ones, which had a more demanding boss (Seago, 2016). This kind of culture actually demands a leader to be robust with the workers in order to reach the required goals.
The Cooperate sector is becoming more ruthless by time. It is important that a less toxic environment is created for employees to be more creative. This concept of toxic leaders in killing the little creativity that the workers have. Organizations need to work on reducing this environment so the workers can be retained and productivity can be reinstalled.
Garrard, P., Garrard, Barlow. (2018).Leadership Hubris Epidemic. Palgrave Macmillan.
Boddy, C. R., Croft, R. (2016). Marketing in a time of toxic leadership.Qualitative Market Research An International Journal,19(1), 44-64.
Anninos, L. N. (2018). Narcissistic business leaders as heralds of the self-proclaimed excellence.International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences,10(1), 49-60.
Edwards, G., Schedlitzki, D., Ward, J., Wood, M. (2015). Exploring critical perspectives of toxic and bad leadership through film.Advances in Developing Human Resources,17(3), 363-375.
Seago, J. (2016). Toxic leaders, toxic culture internal auditors can identify unhealthy behaviors that may undermine the organization.Internal Auditor,73(3), 28-34.
BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT
Running head BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT
rz P ,KwyzWYZt
DU).FX_derhbhb hb5hbhb5hhbhh5hhhh h5hh5hQ. hhQdhQdhQd5hQdh h 5 h 5h h1q agd agd agdy MxyzgdQdgdQdagdQdagd
(,Ie)agdu_agdQ. gdagdagd ,Ie/8(),-8z Msuwhh6hEh5hhhu_ahhbhQ. hQd5 hQ. 5hQ. hQd hQd5hh h5 h5hhbhhh,8 -./0235689FGHSm hhhhdagdEgdagd
,0134679CEFGHIOPQRSjmnouvwxyh hQ. 0JmHnHuh h0Jjh50JUhEjhEUhhh6hh(mnyagdE hh9 0P1hp5/ s666666666vvvvvvvvv6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@Pp2( 0@Pp 0@Pp 0@Pp 0@Pp 0@Pp 0@Pp8XV 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@_HmH nH sH tH NN5NormaldCJ_HaJmH sH tH XAX5 Heading 1@a5KH JaJ BB5 Heading 2@a aJJJ5 Heading 3@5JaJBB5 Heading 4@
56aJ@@5 Heading 5@
6aJDADDefault Paragraph FontRiR0Table Normal4 l4a(k (
.)@.5Page Number6U 65 HyperlinkBphC25Body Text Indent2BB25 Body TextxH@RH5Title@aKHJaJ D DQWPBibliography00PKContent_Types.xmlN0EH-J@ULTB l,3rJBG7OVa(7IRpgLr85vuQ8CX6NJCFB..YTe55 _g -Yl6NPK6_rels/.relsj0Qv/C/(hO Chvxp_P1H0ORBdJE4bq_6LR70O,En7Lib/SePKkytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlM @w7c(EbCA7K
e.,H,lxIsQ ,jGW)E 8PKRtheme/theme/theme1.xmlYF/lMBql4F3 iCCiH/6MwFcd
xuv 0F,FKsO3wvfSVbsyX p5veuw 1z@ l,ib
theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK xml version1.0 encodingUTF-8 standaloneyes
aclrMap xmlnsahttp//schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main bg1lt1 tx1dk1 bg2lt2 tx2dk2 accent1accent1 accent2accent2 accent3accent3 accent4accent4 accent5accent5 accent6accent6 hlinkhlink folHlinkfolHlink/. vvy mEGy8@0( B S
16 0235689Wo 0235689333ABKKW
/8/0EHRnxyE. Q. 2 y 5EGIVu_aQdV QWsHb8q)Fy4MmE02@@UnknownGAx Times New Roman5Symbol3.Cx ArialABCambria MathqhM qg- - 243P P)2xxFull Title of Your Paper HereDeGeorgeRameesha khattakOh0 ,8 Xdp
Full Title of Your Paper HereDeGeorgeNormalRameesha khattak16Microsoft Office Word@@@n
SWORPS Full Title of Your Paper HereTitle(XhZOTERO_PREF_1ZOTERO_PREF_2data data-version3 zotero-version5.0.34session idXY3lgmwq/style idhttp//www.zotero.org/styles/apa localeen-US hasBibliography1 bibliographyStyleHasBeenSet1/prefspref namefieldType valueField/pref nameautomaticJournPalAbbreviations valuetrue/pref namenoteType value0//prefs/data
(,-./02345678Root Entry F z1TableWordDocument.SummaryInformation()DocumentSummaryInformation81CompObjr F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q
Useful LinksFree Essays About Blog
If you have any queries please write to us
Join our mailing list
@ All Rights Reserved 2023 firstname.lastname@example.org